|
Post by Koras on Sept 24, 2009 14:18:25 GMT
Koras:you are just playing a lot of games... tired of worms... i know that feeling... Feche is hyperactive for a long period. So maybe thats why you 2 wormtired fellas made that mega boring game. SD is always an adrenalin and a game finisher. I am surprised to hear that sd makes game boring )) Saying that sd makes game a bit unfair is another thing. But wrong too I had a plan for SD... while he havent, so that was most boring 'part'. Not a moment when SD comes. Since I know how it works its nothing exciting or boring too me. Always same... but in fact some players just cant understood it and keep betching 'wHYYYYY NOW?!' lol btw i am not NNNL schemme hater or something I am just sure this modification is good for schemme. U can write "SD is always an adrenalin and a game finisher." yea sure, but... we can read this sentence from positive and negative way. In my opinion unnecessary adrenalin and fast (sometimes 'unfair')finish isnt something nice. Keep in mind I am one of top 'sd' players ;D lol U can make this public voting but i think will be better if we(U) decide here. People dont even know tnl schemme and some of them start bitich for crates and nice cluster power again:)
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 24, 2009 15:34:41 GMT
I am amazed how illogical this idea of public voting is, it's obvious most of the crowd will vote for nnn scheme because those who like tnl did not sign up (like sabre or pr, I wonder why) Now our voting seems to be in favour of nnn scheme too, so there is no logical reason to start a public voting.
I know in Russia you have this kind of pseudo-democratic voting when everyone thinks they vote, but the result is settled beforehand, what's the point of having it here? jk.
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 24, 2009 15:55:12 GMT
pr, when I talked to him months ago, wouldn't sign up because of the scheme, which seemed to be cwt-intermediate back then. With crates and stuff ya remember, nay? I don't think he will change his position if NNN-League scheme will replace it.
Okay, let's go ontopic and discuss the scheme in the other one.
This solomon keeps ducking questions, whether he's aliasing or not will be clear once I've played a game with him (No I notz having superior skillz to reckon someone by his game style [few exceptions])
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 28, 2009 15:27:12 GMT
WorldMaster is my very good mate.....BUT he is total inactive. I am sure he will be 'trouble maker' again. Betong Asna quited worms years ago... I dont see any reasone to let him play this year(he should go to qualifyers).I am sure he is in very bad shape now... I am sure because some time ago I played vs Javito(5 times cwt play offs) and he was worse then weak ONL player.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 28, 2009 21:13:30 GMT
most important question: what with qualifiers? we have 40 players now:) perfect time to make qualifiers as Kham wrote "Signing after we have 24 will automaticly put player in danger zone. It means that everybody who will sign up after we have 24 players... may go to qualifyers." I think would be good to check their activity:)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2009 8:35:53 GMT
I agree with Koras, qualifiers have to start very soon!
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 29, 2009 11:37:18 GMT
Question is where are those who didn't visit Schedule thread? Should we define them as a quitters? Or just the guys who think that tourney will start at 15th of october so they don't bother checking mails and visiting the forum?
You see... Now we have comfortable amount of people to substitute those who will refuse to play at defined times. But if start qualis... hmmm... we will stil have them as a substitute...
Lemme do a little think...
Okay
I will send another message to all saying that MODs are checking the list for inactives to decide start qualis or not. So those who didn't please visit the Schedule thread to let us know you are active. Edit:
done As a result we can boot some nice fellas so please make some extra effort to reach those who don't read forums and don't check emails they may think they are already there... So booting them may be a bad thing to do.
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 29, 2009 12:59:54 GMT
No games can be started before we agreed on a scheme.
- we have 40 - we need 32 - 24 are set (khams stated in the other thread) - way to determin the 8 more we need -> let the 16 we have too many, devide in 8 pairs and they play bo5 games against each other. Those would be potential troublemakers and who were too late. You make pairs following the newb vs prö principal
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 29, 2009 13:46:05 GMT
n idea and yes we need to vote on scheme.. and to vote on scheme we all need to play tnl scheme... i'll do it this evening.. hope you guys (who never played of course) will do it asap.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 29, 2009 14:47:03 GMT
I think its time to close sign up and start this qualifiers. Since I am most active from mods group i can use my 'knowledge' about wormers activity List of players: 1. Rafka 2. Electro 3. Koras 4. Terror 5. lacoste 6. Albino- not so active but he is a clever guy who shouldnt be a trouble maker 7. Johnmir-same as Albino 8. Antares 9. Kinslayer 10. Kilobyte 11. Tade 12. Viks 13. Lales 14. HaXeN 15. Joschi 16. Tomek 17. Maze 18. ZoloDu 19. darkxxxlord 20. Jigsaw 21. zoky 22. Bytor 23. Random00 24. Master I dont see any serious potencial trouble makers at this list.Maybe Kinslayer... but its not about activity.
25. Gopnick 26. Betong Asna somehow I think he will be trouble maker:) dont know why 27. TenoriTaiga I quess he will play in time, but in fact he playing worms only during holidays 28. Jakka 29. Worldmster lets check his abiility to play worms vs any rookie:) 30. felo not so active lately but he use msn pretty often 31. FaD 32. Wriggler
Waiting list:
1. inspire I heard he is a real normal noob,a nd I never saw him at ag:) 2. Ukrop 3. mattekale retired wormer 4. PiNK 5. solomon I quess its Fantomas, so definitely a bigest trouble maker here. 6. Vuk 7. Fenyrs 8. Samur
abcdef- in my opinion this players who are potencial trouble makers, so they shouldnt play vs each other
Jakka vs Salomon:D for first revange(last year) and for second he can check his IP only when he is playing vs him.
Lets make a pairs and give them few days to play it(for example since this saturday).
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 29, 2009 16:57:21 GMT
I don't need to play I just need to be the host to check incoming connections. But I'd take on Solomon just because it's the most effective way to finally meet him in a game, he's always mute on MSN. Although there is nothing to revenge if it is Fantomas since the game never took place.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 29, 2009 17:46:46 GMT
Lets not hurry up with this games After 1 of october we will have a list of inactives.
Before that we can ask TOTALLY UNKOWN PLAYERS like inspire and solomon contact with Jakka for test games. Of course refuse or no answer means boot.
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 29, 2009 18:29:02 GMT
:0, if you intend to organize test games with those people then please never mention the real purpose they are for. ;0
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Sept 30, 2009 9:16:50 GMT
Lol ... i am here for testing players if you need me aswell
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 30, 2009 9:38:21 GMT
okay i'll message them now.
|
|