|
Post by khamski on Sept 30, 2009 9:36:40 GMT
Joschi is right but we MUST create that poll anyway. Voting must be voting. And not a summary of a dicussion.
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 30, 2009 11:32:28 GMT
LOL, last years scheme was CWT scheme with crates not NNNL. Dario had won 100 (well almost 100 it were 97) games in a row because he is by far way better than all of us in all aspects of the scheme and game knowladge. I don't shut up people, I say people can't decide that's a HUGE difference. And we agreed several times that there is Crespo to decide whenever there is a tie. It's like you see only what you want too see. Do it your way then. Who says that we can't have two schemes? You mean besides me? I'd guess you told it saying "it's completely different scheme". Why makin a tourney with 2 that different schemes then. Give it a thought. But mark my words if you don't change to TNL scheme now, then you will have to do it next year on public demand anyway. Dat's a prediction.
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Sept 30, 2009 14:07:41 GMT
Oh c'mon ... you are all to dramatic as far as this aspect is concerned. Let's use elite scheme and then we can bring some non NNNL guys into our comunity I will always play NNNL scheme and i don't wanna start another discussion here, since you all know my oppinion, but i think that we must stick to the voice of our normal comunity, not to those who are trying to change this normal scheme into something different.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 30, 2009 14:19:59 GMT
Jakka you say players cant decide it... Voices of 3 MODs is nothing for you... Only your voice is significant... So umm... who is Hitler here?
Dario was better? Then get better and stop hiding beside schemes.
I can't get it. Why did we invent voting here? If you see that voting might not reflect your POV you start complaining.
But thats what it is about!
I didn't want to boot Fanto. But i didn't make any voting predictions, i didn't complain, i didn't say "do it your way". We voted for Fanto to go out. So be it. He is out.
I didn't want to take FaD back. We voted to take him back. So be it. He is playing.
So why you say this to me? That i do what i want to do? I don't deserve this negative response neither from you or Jigsaw. Why do you say i can't stand opinions and votes? I can! But you don't vote when you predict undesirable result! It is you who can't stand an opinion. Not me.
ffs guys! Be positive and take what the voting decides! Lets do this job without stupid argues! All together. Don't try to spoil everything just for a rebel feel. Its a dam job we must do for a dam month.
Next year tnl? No problem! If it will be a clear fact that tnl rules then it will be the cwt scheme i guess. But right now it is far from obvious. But anyway we VOTE on it! So make that poll and lets vote!
On completely diff. scheme part: CWT had elite and some other normal schemes as a choice. Home player was choosing the scheme he liked. It was in group games only as i remember but still it was like that.
Crespo part: Sorry but thats a bullshit. We didn't agree on Crespo... we didn't agree on John... we didn't agree on Wriggler. I was supporting all of them. But all i heard is "6 is enough!". After we came to a dead end with it i said i will decide the 3-3 situations.
So Jakka... mate. I respect you and stuff. But If you want to help this tournament just do that poll and lets vote. If not just say you are out. We really don't have much time for this debates.
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 30, 2009 15:55:19 GMT
Yeah compare me to Hitler , but what was the guys name who always changes his mind? Don't you remember what you've said in the first thread? I respect you in some ways too, but there is no logic behind 85% of the stuff you write. And you will have to listen to my bullshit unless you boot me. So where should I make the poll now intern or in public?
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 30, 2009 16:36:22 GMT
Yup, i think that's right. Good it's finally over lol its just your opinion, maybe because U and Joschi are SD lovers ;D make this public pool, we alrady voted here! 4:2 fot tnl and then Kham change decison( so 3:3 now but I still thinking players witch dot know this schemme shouldnt even vote and will be better if they listen pros (yea I talking about myslef lol).
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 30, 2009 16:45:13 GMT
Voting without test is really dumb so if tnl lose(i am almsot sure... because I dont understand why someone who dont know someting shoudl vote on it ). so after ONL schemme win we should 'write' somewhere 'if 2 players agree they can plat CWT'2 schemme'(tnl..) i thinking about alternative schemme for ONL so players finally 'test' it
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 30, 2009 17:09:22 GMT
Well i played it guys thoghts so far: - boring- completely different scheme (though there is just one change) The whole strategy of the game changes. Agree? I think you all are. So why should we stress players like that? Why should we use CWT as a test tourney? In the previous year we used luckless and it was fully tested already. I say tnl is bad idea. we used 'CWT intermeiate'(with crates) schemme last year(same as 2 yearas ago)! thats why we decide here about tnl/onl schemme..... i dont really want stress anyone:) In my opinion 'lucky sd' is more boring then this one from tnl schemme:) For example in '1 hp SD rounds' game ends 1 or 2 tours after SD.....(expect complicated caves). In TNL U still have to use your skill and tactic to kill strong enemy worms:) water rise so U aslo have to think about good hides. but from other hand we have low gravity and shotgun >< awww
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 30, 2009 17:17:49 GMT
Jakka:I would like to listen to everything you say, get your votes and do what voting will tell me to do. Just please don't shake the boat. It is so so easy to ruin our work and so so hard not to fuck it up. Of course intern. We voted for intern. You can say what you want but we will respect our votings and follow them. Koras:Thats what was mentioned We must add 'tnl if both agree" as a third option. Thats all. Everyone is happy. edit: Koras we have an evil silent forum guardian who may boot you for your tripple posts
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 30, 2009 17:19:07 GMT
As Koras said there is no point in making it intern since obviously it's going to be 3:3. I didn't think of that in advance. Oops.
I think you get a wrong impression of me, as if I wouldn't shut up and accept a valid voting or if you would make the decision. But until the results are in I won't shut up if I think something is going the wrong way. And there is nothing wrong about "shaking the boat" from time to time.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 30, 2009 17:29:35 GMT
I didn't get you right. So do you make that poll or what?
edit:
I went in public and saw the poll there. It was a mistake to post it there. We voted to make it intern. And we will follow our voting results. Thread is deleted.
Jakka i hope it was a misunderstanding. Next time you do stunt like this you are out of the MODs Squad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 22:04:20 GMT
There is going something wrong. We didnt got anything yet! No Qualifiers, no rules, no last players list... but you still go ahead to argue. It seems that this squad team doesnt work well. We need a big boss :-)
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 30, 2009 22:32:47 GMT
I am badly suprised of by this conversation at all:)
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 1, 2009 8:37:43 GMT
Its alright, fellas. 4 voted on a scheme. We need last 1. Or last 2 if Jigsaw will come back.
|
|