|
Post by Tomek on Oct 12, 2011 15:09:16 GMT
okay first blood against stripe gg's
|
|
|
Post by Tomek on Oct 12, 2011 15:16:58 GMT
damn my report was good and there is 3-1 for stripe.. ( in hole was option "I won") but result is different and i got more points than him..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2011 16:39:24 GMT
No worries Tomek, that will be fixed. Zemke will fix all problems (I guess tonight) and delete your game, so you can make a proper report tomorrow.
Thanks for your first game!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2011 16:40:22 GMT
P.S. Rafka, you are really in the wrong thread. Just pm them at cwtsite.com by PM, it's the most simple and the most transparent way.
|
|
|
Post by Chicken23 on Oct 12, 2011 18:37:56 GMT
Mablak, Random00 and Alex13 Group D stands for Group of Death lol Is the home and away system in place? Im a fan of cave-cave-open if it'll be my home games.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2011 21:40:43 GMT
Rules say: Tourney structure: Group Stage Mode: • Each group contains 4 players. • Everyone plays a best-of-five game against every other player in their group (only 1 time bo5). • There is no Home-and-Away System anymore.
Moreover, it's players choose what map order they prefere. If they don't find an agreement, cave-cave-open-open-cave is standard.
Nice to have you on board :-) Do you remember at our early CWT game?
|
|
|
Post by Chicken23 on Oct 12, 2011 23:07:50 GMT
Nice to have you on board :-) Do you remember at our early CWT game? nope 0-3 to Random00.. My CWT may be short lived! lol
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 21, 2011 19:04:12 GMT
few words about new system Group G if John will lose with FaD(1:3,2:3) but will be second in group it will prove that your new system totally system failed.... and all changes was unnecessery. Its WA, there is no reasone to put single rounds higher then wins. Even Drio my lose one round vs newcomer cause of BL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2011 21:42:55 GMT
I say "if John will lose 1:3 but will be second in group it will prove that new system totally system" worked...
hah! man Koras, learn to discuss, with the best will in the world I couldn't find your argument(s). I always only know that you are against something, and most of the time, because of it breaks with our glory tradition.
|
|
|
Post by Kayz on Oct 21, 2011 23:03:56 GMT
Ye but I wonder, too, even now Johnmir is on rank 2 actually before the game of him vs FaD, though he lost to Fenrys and has one more less won game than him. I found it weird to give people 2 points who lose 2-3. ^^ But since I was too late to take part in this discussion, this is done already, and if Johnmir gets a 1-3 or 2-3, he played better than Fenrys vs FaD, and that means something either, though he lost to Fenrys. It's a difficult case
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 22, 2011 5:33:47 GMT
dont U see it?? do U really need my arguments here? ok Results of game are more important then single rounds, especially in intermediate schemme!! btw imo it may also cause some kind of corruption.... Now FaD may decide who will play in PO, in previous CWT it was also possible but there was 6 games so last onewasnt that important. Especially when opponent need just 1 points, even if he have worse game ratio. glory radition? sure ,it was cool system and now its not as good as it was before.... just because U wanted 100% games played. I know I like tradition but from other hand i think new mods group like to much change things witch was ok.... instead of concentrate at more important things. I know U want good future of CWT but what we got here? This site is worse then this from last year(i have serious problems with download replays). There is no archive, so new wormers cant check long story of this great turney. Our Profiles gone. Sorry but I liked old CWT site more.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 22, 2011 5:35:45 GMT
d if Johnmir gets a 1-3 or 2-3, he played better than Fenrys vs FaD, and that means something either, though he lost to Fenrys. It's a difficult case yeh i hope John will win this game too...
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 22, 2011 11:51:22 GMT
I think MODs did everything just the way it should be done. Old home/away system is unmanageable and obsolete.
System that Dario proposed is good. But he came late with it. I am sure it will be considered in preparations for '12 edition.
Koras "John case" arguments are wrong. It was clearly declared that rounds are more important than wins. fenrys knew it. He lost 2 rounds to John thus giving John a chance to take 2nd spot.
Koras, the only one you can blame in some "wrong" system is yourself. If you care about it so much you should visit CWT forums and participate in discussion.
*sorry for multiply edits
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 22, 2011 16:54:40 GMT
Koras "John case" arguments are wrong. It was clearly declared that rounds are more important than wins. fenrys knew it. He lost 2 rounds to John thus giving John a chance to take 2nd spot. Koras, the only one you can blame in some "wrong" system is yourself. If you care about it so much you should visit CWT forums and participate in discussion. *sorry for multiply edits yeh it was declared, but now we can see system its simply wrong. he won 2 games but there is a chance he wont play in PO, even if another guy won just 1 game in group stage. In intermediate schemme rounds shouldnt be more important then games, its obvious. I didnt take part in discussion cause i ddint expected change like that. And after all i dont really care, it just suck. Luckily I am not in Fenyrs position atm.
|
|
|
Post by TenoriTaiga on Oct 22, 2011 18:20:23 GMT
This.
|
|