|
Post by Zemke on Oct 27, 2012 10:55:08 GMT
Disadvantage: Players can't play their next playoff stage games, before everybody has played their games. Yeah, that's a good point. That kind of makes me drop that idea. pls dont cry about last year so hard it was very good tourney, i was best in my half of tree so I reached final:). I agree with you. Key to the best playoff drawing system could be to not divide the tournament into two branches. The problem with the current system is, that there are two competitions happening independently from each other. One competition in the first branch and one in the other. One way to solve this is the Double-elimination tournament. It's interesting, because it's not so one-way-like and by that seeds chances to win equally. It might be hard to grasp at first, but you should check that out. I'm becoming a fan of this. Dario has proposed that last year and also mentioned it before this year's tournament. so 32 players...8 groups....when 1st stage complete we have new 4 groups with 4 players(best two from groups in 1st stage)..to be fair 1st player from 1st stage group will have 2 points at start 2nd stage.....after 2nd group stage finsih we have 8 players in KO stage...IMO u will rly have best players in last 8,we will all have many games to watch,and finaly we will get winner Well, actually you'd just delay our current problems by one stage. Drawing still remains a problem here, even if it's just eight instead of sixteen players.
|
|
|
Post by Zemke on Nov 3, 2012 0:37:48 GMT
Why is no one replying or am I being impatient? :s
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Nov 3, 2012 7:11:44 GMT
I quess no one cares... now we got very similar situation like in last year.
|
|
|
Post by Zemke on Nov 3, 2012 9:52:37 GMT
No one cares? There's been an intense discussion before and now that I propose things it's muted. Aw, I'm going through tough times. I just want to see opinions about that Double-elimination tournament anyway.
I guess I'll just have to do some private talks, but f-off my Messenger has died.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2012 16:13:58 GMT
I propose you to keep the current system. CWT moved forward 3 years in row. New sites and tourney modifications were presented. Now we have got the best site CWT ever had. Playoff rules proved as well equal treatment of everybody, the draw of balanced playoff trees and maximal transparency. Let's leave it at that, every modification will result automatically in another discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Zemke on Nov 5, 2012 17:14:31 GMT
Signed.
|
|