Crespo
Member
CWT founder
Posts: 758
|
Post by Crespo on Jan 24, 2007 15:15:41 GMT
vote please...
|
|
|
|
Post by MrTPenguin on Jan 25, 2007 18:52:47 GMT
Hang on, if we're gonna only have one scheme, why don't we abandon the home/away system too? We only introduced that because of arguments over which scheme to play with, so now there's no need for it. This would make the group stage quicker.
|
|
SirGorash
Member
yes i know, not your day...
Posts: 204
|
Post by SirGorash on Jan 25, 2007 21:50:04 GMT
Whats next then? This way CWT will no longer be CWT. I disagree on such changes. I wanna play normals, not just inter, I wanna have the chance of playing another day the second half of a game (Home or away), i wanna chose to play Inter against Elite players aswell as i love the challenge of playing Elite against them, thats part of CWT, its spice, dont take it out  |
|
Crespo
Member
CWT founder
Posts: 758
|
Post by Crespo on Jan 25, 2007 21:52:00 GMT
MrTP I do believe we can stick ourselves with the home/away system with relation to maps different players prefer different maps and that would make more games. In fact if we take the home away system out the amount of games to be done in group stage will be diminished to only 3, which clearly implies a corresponding decrease of fun and competition, plus: the same would lead to an increase of the importance of the luck factor in outcome in terms of point of each player.
|
|
Johnmir
Member
Karate Kid
Love normal!:D
Posts: 273
|
Post by Johnmir on Jan 25, 2007 23:11:35 GMT
I agree with Crespo. It will be kind of one evening tourney  (MrTP likes them  ). |
|
|
|
Post by Dario on Jan 26, 2007 12:36:43 GMT
I agree with Crespo on that during the group stage players should play 2 games against every other player in their group.
About playing other schemes, FB league has separated rankings for each scheme, plus another ranking which chosiders them all. I mean that if you want an elite challenge, you can play FB league and also Elite league. If you like PRO scheme, FB has that one too. You will find a lot more experienced elite players at those 2 leagues than at CWT. In fact, those players are better at elite than most CWT-ers.
I honestly don't see the point of playing elite, pro and tournament in the group stage if the champion is going to be decided in an Intermediate match. If we want to extend this to an all-normal schemes then there would be too many to include. I think that a league is more adecuate to consider more than one scheme, while a tournament should consider only one.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrTPenguin on Jan 26, 2007 15:33:16 GMT
I was thinking that if it's good enough for knockout stage games, then it's good enough for group games, but of course, KO games are first-to-3, not first-to-2, so they aren't the same!
Let's keep the H&A system then.
|
|
|
|
Post by RatoonSoft on Jan 26, 2007 18:18:04 GMT
My vote is "intermediate only" because i havn't time to play and become a good player in several scheme ... i'm not really good in "intermediate" so !!
Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by GeneralHorn on Jan 26, 2007 21:40:43 GMT
Hi all!
As I said before, I am for "intermediate only", in the final rounds, noone can choose, why in groups? That was a strange rule from on when I came to play CWT....
Ah, and there are other things to choose in the home matches, e.g. structure of the map...opened or cavern and so on....the system is best like that, 6 games are not really much to clear the places in group...3 would never be enough...
And we do a democratic decision here...if the vote would be against crates e.g., I wouldnt like, but I would accept...
Greets, Horn.
|
|
|
|
Post by AquaWorm on Jan 27, 2007 18:56:05 GMT
Please keep H&A and all the schemes. CWT is known as normal tournament, not intermediate. If you wanna be a really good player, you must be skillful at more than one scheme.
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Jan 27, 2007 19:56:29 GMT
CWT is all round normal tournament only in theory. We play only inters in playoffs (and there is no way to change it) it makes CWT an intermediate tourney. An frankly, since the finals are inters, why should I play other schemes in the group stage?
|
|
Johnmir
Member
Karate Kid
Love normal!:D
Posts: 273
|
Post by Johnmir on Jan 29, 2007 19:06:22 GMT
It was said by pro elite player btw!
|
|
|
|
Post by NormalPRO on Jan 29, 2007 23:20:13 GMT
I agree to Jigsaw, there is no sense to play different schemes in group stage. There are 4 main reasons: 1) As it was said all play-off games are on intermediate,and why should we play in groups other schemes. Just imagine in footbal World Cup in group stage you play with 7 players each team and 30 min per perion while in play-offs you play "normal" footbal with 11 players each teme and 45 min of the period. I think it is nonsense, just like other schemes in CWT except intermediate. 2) Many players have not enough time just to learn different schemes. You can learn tournament scheme and play it everyday, while your opponent just did not trained it before. He maybe a better player than you but he probably could not win you just because he did not know some particular details of other scheme. I do not think it is right. It makes all complicated, while I think better to make things clear. 3) On other schemes like PRO or Tournament, you ammunition pack goes from round to round and it can cause serious problems if disconnection happens. I think you understand what I mean. 4) Just look at the voting, aroungd 80% are for only intermediate scheme tournament. We should not ignore it  That is why, let's make things clear and play only well-known and well-balanced normal intermediate scheme |
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Jan 30, 2007 13:15:16 GMT
thats a fun thing about democratic voting, even if we are not right we are still right
|
|
Crespo
Member
CWT founder
Posts: 758
|
Post by Crespo on Jan 30, 2007 13:22:36 GMT
When 17 votes are reached by any side I will lock the votation since absolute majority was reached.
Ans yes the votation shall not be put aside. Intermediate will surely be the only scheme in CWT 2007...
|
|
(MrTP likes them 
). 
!
