Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 13, 2009 9:44:01 GMT
intermediate with crates is obsolete, no point in forcing it anymore I'd prefer tnl scheme, but that's just me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2009 10:51:24 GMT
nah, sd is a must in my eyes!
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 13, 2009 10:59:33 GMT
Jakko seconds TNL scheme, but doesn't this issue have to be discussed in public. Of course, since, as Lenin said, teh people don't know what they want, it's reasonable to put it here.
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 13, 2009 11:59:36 GMT
lol, some polish member of parliament few years ago said "a random nation shouldn't decide about such stuff"
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 13, 2009 13:04:04 GMT
I don't think players must decide it. But certainly we must start the discussion and after that make a decision here.
btw whats tnl? nnnintermediate + no hp reduce sd?
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 13, 2009 13:25:16 GMT
btw whats tnl? nnnintermediate + no hp reduce sd? Yer.
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Sept 15, 2009 7:16:58 GMT
NNNxLuckless FTW!
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 15, 2009 7:42:01 GMT
One certain (imo) thing is that the current scheme is an ancient relic and it should be changed. Whether we change to NNN or TNL is a secondary matter. But if we change to NNN "would it look like NNN is absorbing CWT?" I think there will be 3-3 on that, what then?
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 15, 2009 9:15:03 GMT
That is why i thought of Wriggler to join us. Dunno if he wants it or no tho.
And yes that absorption thing is not that good. We can make an experiment with that tnl scheme. Why not?
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 15, 2009 12:57:18 GMT
TNL even if I like SD, its simply more fair. I have idea how to test TNL schemme: group stage NNN or TNL(if 2 players agree) then after group stage all 16 players who reach play offs vote for one offical cwt schemme TNL or NNN. no ofense to Antares,Joschi and Khamski but maybe U should check this schemme before vote btw: we can also invite whole NNN to mods group lol>< for now Wrigler dont have spot
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 15, 2009 13:03:25 GMT
You start with a scheme and you finish with same scheme. Annual CWT shouldn't be a test-dummy.
Do the testings on TNL. So far, everyone who played it preferes TNL scheme even if he liked nnn-league scheme more before.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 15, 2009 15:01:23 GMT
No tests or public voting needed really. It will cause mayhem, argues and stuff. I think we mustl decide it here. Either we choose TNL for a whole tourney. Or NNNL for a whole tourney.
I go for TNL.
Koras: You wrong about number of MODs. We need as more Judges as we can have. And with the large number we can make decision without bizarre public voting. But we need only coldheaded guys. I think Wrig is that kind of a guy. We need his opinion. So we will have another Judge plus we will have a lucky seven that will vote efficiently.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 15, 2009 16:05:16 GMT
I suggest Kilobyte(he played in CWT). Jakka is right! shock therapy!
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 15, 2009 16:10:02 GMT
nothing personal but Wriggler never played in cwt, plus the mod squad begins to look like nnn mod squad already
do we really need one more person? how about we ask Crespo whenever theres a tie
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 16, 2009 8:50:28 GMT
Crespo is a very good idea.
|
|