Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 23, 2009 6:56:16 GMT
why does kilo have to be a mod on forum to update the site? just give him the password/s and get on with it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2009 8:51:54 GMT
Doesnt look it bad, to ask someone, because he seems to be the only capaple person under us, without letting him in our mod circle? He isnt the person who starts no ending discussions, aswell he doesnt post unnecessary things. So I wounder why it is a problem, to call a person to mod, who will help us at one of the most important things.
But still, if Jakka get it aswell, I m more then happy.
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 23, 2009 11:11:01 GMT
it's not a problem, I just feel it would look stupid to have so many mods, maybe I'm wrong, what others think?
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 23, 2009 14:26:59 GMT
6,7 mods who cares (.....all NNN). our priority for now: 1.site (have to be update)! 2.final players list! 3.final decision about schemme then we can make a groups and wrote some strick rules:)
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 23, 2009 15:19:40 GMT
Jakko thinks: - there are already way too many mods here - it's NOT particularly good that all of them are in NNN (except crespo [if he shows up every now and then]) - If you pick a mod he shall be reasonable and qualified to decide about major issues, which I don't think of Kilo. - The HTML updates are not so big and hard that we need an extra hand. Wait until the weekend and we will have some of the solutions then.
Isn't final player list issue already solved?
And since Khamski said "Why not" to TNL scheme that makes us 4 and we winz? Nay?
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 23, 2009 17:50:08 GMT
And since Khamski said "Why not" to TNL scheme that makes us 4 and we winz? Nay? I hope so.Just finished mega boring round vs Feche.... after many dumb miss he start wait for SD unfortunately half of my worms was blocked so he coudl even won
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 23, 2009 18:27:13 GMT
I've change my opinion about tnl... I mean about the fact that we will decide it in private section. I go for public voting. reason? i am afraid too many players will be badly surprised by it and may quit right away or after first unlucky games. I think without a duscussion in public this major change in cwt rules my bring havoc to the tourney. Look a bit ahead... We don't want that. Koras:you are just playing a lot of games... tired of worms... i know that feeling... Feche is hyperactive for a long period. So maybe thats why you 2 wormtired fellas made that mega boring game. SD is always an adrenalin and a game finisher. I am surprised to hear that sd makes game boring )) Saying that sd makes game a bit unfair is another thing. But wrong too
|
|
|
Post by Jakka on Sept 23, 2009 18:45:26 GMT
i am afraid too many players will be badly surprised by it and may quit right away or after first unlucky games. I have a different opinion on this, but you're da boss! Since when do ordinary people decide about things that are above them ;'D
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 23, 2009 23:51:54 GMT
Yep i want to have some initiative but not all of it So i declare voting. Question: CWT 2009 scheme will be chosen by: Public voting or MODs voting ? Again i ask to think over the consequences... I already hear that tnl scheme is unexceptable for some players. Aaand please say your vote once and for good. Clear answer. I vote for public vomiting.. ehm.. voting.
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 24, 2009 6:06:38 GMT
I don't really like first-and-maybe-last-timers to decide on anything, people come and go, their ungrounded decisions may last several seasons
I have a problem with idiots voting too, there are some signed up but I won't name them, no need.
Khamski, it's your time now, so if you want to have nnn scheme just make that decision, or maybe you can't because you've never played the other scheme? If you want to leave such fundamental decisions to the crowd, why do we have a mod squad?
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Sept 24, 2009 6:29:58 GMT
I agree with Khams on this one. This decision will affect every1 gaming style. I don't like TNL, maybe because i adapted my strategy for SD many years ago. But that doesen't mean if the ''crowd'' decides on tnl i will not play. Why do we have a mod squad? For decisions that doesen't concern the average ''joe'', for fast implementing-decision making and for all tournament organizational stuff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2009 7:08:49 GMT
Public voting
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Inevitability
Posts: 643
|
Post by Jigsaw on Sept 24, 2009 8:12:32 GMT
that will only cause a lot of bitching, you want nnn scheme you can just decide on it, 3-3, khamski decides and there it is, where's the problem?
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Sept 24, 2009 9:12:15 GMT
MODs voting is bad... public voting is bad... Poland has no american rockets anymore... life is ruined... russians are coming... even in CWT... we all will be dead.. aaahh.. ))) jk We all will be dead finally but now we have to run this great tourney You see things in some bad color, mate. Cheer up. Yes this question is extra important. I want all MODs to understand it and act accordingly. I don't have plans to let CWT go a wrong way. Players are not a "crowd". We are doing this all for our players. And i think this is their time to decide. We have a system here for making important decisions. Thats why i ask you all to express your will. I honestly don't think someone has any reason to start a drama here.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Sept 24, 2009 13:51:08 GMT
I've change my opinion about tnl... I mean about the fact that we will decide it in private section. I hope U change your 'opinion' because U played a round with this schemme indecisive public voting sux I have better idea Antares,Joschi adn Khamski play mini tourney with TNL schemme:) after few games they finally understood TNL>ONL after 'tourney' 6;0 in voting ;D
|
|