Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2009 10:14:11 GMT
Yea, I support Fantomas as a Judge. He has free time now. And he can play three Judges, another point to call him.
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Oct 8, 2009 13:01:28 GMT
Rofl!
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 8, 2009 15:05:33 GMT
I just wanna say I totally disagree with ban for PiNK.but U are boos here... i dotn want start any discussion:) just my presonal opinion But I dont care about Kayz... he dont even read rules:) i inive him to cwt in last day of sign ups.. looks like he dont really care.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 8, 2009 16:05:39 GMT
Okay i got your opinion, Koras. It is pretty starightforward. he broke the rules several times. Anyway i waited till he is calm. And routed him to a schedule thread header to read it more carefully with a note... that if he comes back with complaints again.. he will be banned. He came back and continued complaining. I banned him.
So really not much to discuss. It won't be any other way here. You break the rules you are out.
If i'll have to ban all players except one i will. And that last will be the champion.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 21, 2009 17:42:01 GMT
as I see Antares won vs Master 2x2;0 but Master is baned, so my question is what with matakelle and samur who play vs Antares? If I could I would prefer cancal Master/Antares game... even if its not fair for Antares.
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 21, 2009 17:52:14 GMT
yes these situations are out of my imagination
help needed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2009 18:01:43 GMT
Lol antares is just playing vs newcomers Antares will keep his win. We cant disadvantage CWT participants. I formulated some recplacing rules (nr.3 hits in this case): Player B replaces Player A: 1.If Player A will be replaced after he won a game vs. Player C, Player B has to replay this game. Player C gets another chance or he agrees, due to less time, on a draw. 2.If Player A will be replaced after he missed a scheduled game, Player B must live with this lost game. He doesn’t get the possibility to play the missed game. 3.If Player A will be replaced after he lost a game, Player B must live with this lost game. If Player A lost 2-1 the result will turn into 2-0. There may be a lot of more situations, but in conclusion it is clear: Player B has to live with coming disadvantages; we can’t expect extra efforts of Player C.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 21, 2009 18:51:40 GMT
camaaaan 'tabula rasa' ftw but maybe we should let Antares decide what to do. If I am not wrong we have this short list of tech win/lose games: Tomek vs Maze 0:2/0:2 because of Tomek connection problems HaXeN vs Jigsaw 0:2/0:2 because HaXeN didit back from school in time... as U see both time it was accidents(I mean not their faults), so maybe we should let them play again (only if 'winners' agree).Maybe 2 pints for win insteed of 3 is good idea. As we can see only this guys who join tournamnet late dont play any game, so for now everything working good.
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Oct 22, 2009 8:46:07 GMT
I have no problem playing again with the new guys in group. Just it's irritating to schedule and waste few hours to play and win a player who gets banned
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 22, 2009 9:23:54 GMT
NO REMATCH
it's a general abuse to fixed schedule and to the organisation of this tournament itself. we can't allow it.
So Antares won't play remacthes.. He won his game.
Another question what to do with points of a joined player.
Thats a question.
But no rematches.
|
|
|
Post by Koras on Oct 22, 2009 11:13:03 GMT
I have no problem playing again with the new guys in group. Just it's irritating to schedule and waste few hours to play and win a player who gets banned caman it was 4:0:) 4x15/20 min=1h/1h 20 min Only good idea is let both play 1 game against Antares:)
|
|
|
Post by Antares on Oct 22, 2009 11:55:48 GMT
Ye, it was 4-0 and i finish it pretty fast considering my dominant style ... now maybe i play different and win 4-2 and all rounds with an average of 21-22 min I don't see a solution here so i could play vs them normally, no problem...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2009 12:46:29 GMT
Koras: Maybe your suggestion works in Antares case, because, if we are honest, chance that Antares get first place in his group are very high. But you cant demand from another player, if he is in the same case like Antares, he only has less chances to get into PO stage, that he give away his points, and play his only won games again. Because that means, he has lost six points, thought he isnt guilty, and maybe he cant qualifice for PO games. If we let new players let play the missed games of the players who get disqualified, then whole fixed schedule system would be senseless. With this system we promised participants not to waste time by waiting for their opponents. We guaranteed them, if they are in time at fixed deadline, to play their games, or when his opponent doesnt appear, he get free win. Allowing this, we would break our promise to all CWT participants. Just my view. :-)
|
|
|
Post by khamski on Oct 22, 2009 17:45:32 GMT
so now you see why Vuks 6 points was a better solution.
|
|