Crespo
Member
CWT founder
Posts: 758
|
Post by Crespo on Feb 28, 2004 21:39:13 GMT
I received a report today of a game played in Retro scheme. Although Retro scheme is NOT on the listed schemes it's a playable and tactical scheme too. also, I 've also talked with a cwter (apart from the cwter who played home using retro in the refered report) who who would think of retro as a playable cwt scheme. Please vote and make up my mind!
|
|
|
Post by Teletubbies on Feb 29, 2004 10:58:28 GMT
I think once we have set the rules for a tournament we should stick to them for that year. As I said before, we have had months to discuss the rules. We should not be changing them during a tournament. Retro may be a good scheme and we can adopt it next year. But this year lets just stick to what we have decided on already and minimise confusion.
|
|
|
Post by Xaositect on Feb 29, 2004 21:08:35 GMT
[glow=red,2,300]I agree with Teletubbies, changing rules after the start is unfair[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by MrTPenguin on Feb 29, 2004 21:20:54 GMT
I'd quite like CWT to be Intermediate-8v8 only (scheme versatility would be achieved in friendlies). Seeing as this isn't the case, I don't think Retro should be included, mainly because of the limited weapons and the lack of retreat time. And as has been already said, we mustn't change the rules during the tournament unless we absolutely have to.
EDIT: Silly me - I've just checked the rules and seen that the knockout stage is Intermediate-8v8.
|
|
Crespo
Member
CWT founder
Posts: 758
|
Post by Crespo on Mar 1, 2004 14:14:51 GMT
gotcha all! no retro this year then...
ash and betong your 2nd game (ash playing home) must be replayed!!
|
|